Examiner Anthony G Gemignani has allowed 128 of 177 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Anthony G Gemignani maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 177 disposed applications, 128 were allowed and 49 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 72%. This figure reflects decisions on applications that have been resolved; it excludes pending filings. The record spans art units 2154 and 2164, aggregated into a single pooled statistic.
This pooled record combines outcomes across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate statistics mask variation between individual art units—detailed per-unit records appear separately. Pooled data provides a broad historical picture but does not forecast results in any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 121 decided applications with an interview and 44 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 12 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Anthony G Gemignani has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 177 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP