Examiner Anthony J Amoroso has allowed 320 of 362 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Anthony J Amoroso maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 362 disposed applications in 1 art unit, 320 were allowed and 42 were abandoned. The allowance rate is 88% of those decided applications. This pooled record spans a single art unit and reflects historical outcomes only, without reference to any pending matters or future applications.
This page reports a pooled record aggregating all of an examiner's art units. The 88% allowance rate describes past dispositions across 362 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units. Consult the per-art-unit breakdown separately to understand performance in your specific classification. Aggregate statistics inform general context only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 162 decided applications with an interview and 200 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Anthony J Amoroso has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 362 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP