Examiner Anthony Ray Chavez has allowed 1 of 8 decided applications (13%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Anthony Ray Chavez maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit. Across 8 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 13%. Of 53 total applications on file, 1 has been allowed and 7 have been abandoned. The allowance rate of 13% represents decided applications only and is not a share of all filings.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to an examiner. The figures—allowance rate, disposed applications, and allowed count—describe the historical record and do not predict the outcome of any specific application. The 13% allowance rate reflects past decisions on 8 closed applications and is correlational only, not predictive of future examination outcomes.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Anthony Ray Chavez has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP