LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/ANUGEETHA KUNJITHAPATHAM
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Anugeetha Kunjithapatham

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 91 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Anugeetha Kunjithapatham has allowed 57 of 91 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

63% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Anugeetha Kunjithapatham maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 113 total applications, 57 have been allowed and 34 abandoned, yielding 91 disposed applications. The allowance rate is 63% of those decided applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's dispositions across that unit and represents the historical record of allowed versus abandoned applications.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record is pooled across all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction. Aggregate allowance rates describe past dispositions and do not predict outcomes in any specific application. Because the record combines multiple art units, the figure reflects an overall profile rather than performance in a single field. Individual art-unit detail may appear separately on this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2165
113 APPS · 63% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

63% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION57 / 34 / 22allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.2 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.1 moart unit avg 39.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility48% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)43%
§103 — Obviousness93% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness66%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW72%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW50%+22 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 53 decided applications with an interview and 38 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Anugeetha Kunjithapatham

  • What is Anugeetha Kunjithapatham's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 63%, calculated from 57 allowed applications out of 91 disposed (decided) applications. This figure is pooled across all art units and describes the historical record only.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2165) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate tell me?
    The allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided applications that were allowed in the past. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and applies only to the pooled historical record presented here.
  • What is the difference between total and disposed applications?
    Total applications (113) includes all filings. Disposed applications (91) counts only those that have been decided—allowed or abandoned. The allowance rate is calculated from disposed applications only; pending cases are excluded.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Anugeetha Kunjithapatham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 113 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP