Examiner Anzuman Sharmin has allowed 152 of 188 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Anzuman Sharmin maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 221 total applications, 188 have been disposed of (decided). Of those 188 decided applications, 152 were allowed and 36 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 81%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications in that art unit and is a historical summary of dispositions made to date.
This record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s) within TC 2100. The 81% allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—pending cases are excluded. Pooled figures describe past dispositions and do not forecast the outcome of any individual application. An aggregate rate reflects the examiner's historical record but does not determine any specific case's result.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 101 decided applications with an interview and 87 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Anzuman Sharmin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 221 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP