LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/APRIL YING SHAN BLAIR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner April Ying Shan Blair

TECH CENTER 2100 · 6 ART UNITS · 108 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION APR 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 6 ART UNITS

Examiner April Ying Shan Blair has allowed 82 of 108 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

76% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2196 · 100%AU 2135 · 61%AU 2187 · 90%AU 2111 · 100%AU 2117 · 0%AU 2191 · 100%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

April Ying Shan Blair maintains a pooled allowance rate of 76% across 108 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Her public record spans 6 art units: 2111, 2117, 2135, 2187, 2191, and 2196. Of 143 total applications, 82 were allowed and 26 abandoned. The allowance rate across her art units ranges from 61% to 100%, reflecting variation in her record within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates her work across multiple art units and represents her historical disposition record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled allowance rate aggregates an examiner's performance across multiple art units into a single figure. This rate describes past dispositions—applications decided as either allowed or abandoned—and does not constitute a prediction about any specific application. The range shown reflects differences in allowance rates among individual art units; the pooled rate is a weighted summary across all units in the examiner's record. Pooled data provides context for an examiner's overall record but does not predict outcomes on particular cases.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2196
59 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines program control and execution.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 73%
DISPOSITION24 / 0 / 35allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30 moart unit avg 27.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY43.5 moart unit avg 41.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility67% · art unit 44%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)72%
§103 — Obviousness83% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness48%
ART UNIT 2135
49 APPS · 61% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

61% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION30 / 19 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY50.2 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
ART UNIT 2187
21 APPS · 90% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

90% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION19 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION28.5 moart unit avg 23.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.1 moart unit avg 36.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility50% · art unit 39%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)50%
§103 — Obviousness89% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness61%

Based on 21 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2111
8 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA
100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 80%
DISPOSITION8 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION16.2 moart unit avg 20.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY27.3 moart unit avg 31.7 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility43% · art unit 22%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)57%
§103 — Obviousness86% · art unit 72%
§112 — Written description & definiteness57%

Based on 8 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2117
5 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines control or regulating systems.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 74%
DISPOSITION0 / 5 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION17.1 moart unit avg 20.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY25.6 moart unit avg 33.2 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility20% · art unit 32%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness80%

Based on 5 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

ART UNIT 2191
1 APPS · 100% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.

100% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 76%
DISPOSITION1 / 0 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.7 moart unit avg 28.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY33.4 moart unit avg 41.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner April Ying Shan Blair

  • What is April Ying Shan Blair's allowance rate?
    Her pooled allowance rate is 76%, calculated across 108 disposed applications (allowed and abandoned combined) in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Her public record spans 6 art units: 2111, 2117, 2135, 2187, 2191, and 2196, all within Technology Center 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across her art units?
    Allowance rates across her art units range from 61% to 100%, indicating variation in her record within TC 2100.
  • Does this pooled rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate describes her historical record only and is not a prediction of any specific application outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner April Ying Shan Blair has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 143 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP