Examiner Aravind K Moorthy

What the data says.

Aravind K Moorthy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 88 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 49 and abandoned 39. The allowance rate is 56% over the 88 decided cases. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided in TC 2100 during the period covered by the public database.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates all applications disposed by the examiner across their art unit(s) in TC 2100. Pooled figures describe the past record and are not predictions about any specific application. The allowance rate of 56% represents the share of decided applications that were allowed, calculated from the total disposed count. Individual applications may vary in outcome independent of these aggregate statistics.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Aravind K Moorthy

• 01What is Aravind K Moorthy's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 56%, calculated from 49 allowed applications and 39 abandoned applications (88 disposed total). This figure describes the examiner's pooled record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner works within one art unit, which is pooled in this overall record in TC 2100.
• 03What does the 56% allowance rate mean?

  Of 88 applications decided by the examiner, 56% resulted in allowance. The allowance rate is computed only from disposed applications; pending cases are excluded. This historical aggregate does not predict the outcome of any individual application.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 88 applications in TC 2100.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.