Examiner Arezoo Sherkat has allowed 51 of 97 decided applications (53%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Arezoo Sherkat maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 97 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 51 and abandoned 46. The allowance rate stands at 53% of decided applications. The record spans a single art unit, pooling all prosecution activity within that unit's jurisdiction. This figure represents historical dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
A pooled record aggregates all applications across an examiner's assigned art units into a single allowance-rate figure. This aggregate describes past dispositions and does not predict outcomes on individual applications. The rate reflects applications already decided—allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending matters. Pooled data provides a historical baseline; results on any specific application may vary based on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 27 decided applications with an interview and 70 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Arezoo Sherkat has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 97 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP