Examiner Arshia S Kia has allowed 34 of 66 decided applications (52%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Arshia S Kia maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 66 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 34 and abandoned 32, yielding an allowance rate of 52% over that decided count. This figure reflects the proportion of applications that reached allowance among all applications with final dispositions recorded in the examiner's pooled record. The record aggregates activity across art units 2155 and 2197.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's decisions across multiple art units within a technology center. The allowance rate describes the historical proportion of decided applications that were allowed, calculated from applications with final dispositions—allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending matters. This aggregate figure is a summary of past record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art-unit records may vary.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution, and software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 25 decided applications with an interview and 37 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 4 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Arshia S Kia has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 66 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP