Examiner Asad M Nawaz has allowed 43 of 81 decided applications (53%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Asad M Nawaz has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 81 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 53%, with 43 applications allowed and 38 abandoned. This record spans a single art unit (2155). The allowance rate reflects decisions on applications that have been resolved; it excludes pending cases. The figures represent the examiner's historical disposition record and do not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units where the examiner has worked. The allowance rate and disposal counts describe past decisions and represent a historical snapshot. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes on individual applications, which may vary by art unit, claim scope, prior art, and case-specific factors. Pooled statistics are useful for understanding an examiner's overall record but are not determinative of any single case's path.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 28 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Asad M Nawaz has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 81 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP