Examiner Asghar H Bilgrami

What the data says.

Examiner Asghar H Bilgrami maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 73 disposed applications, 26 were allowed and 47 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 36% over the decided applications. The examiner's work spans one art unit. This record reflects historical dispositions and does not predict outcomes in any specific pending application. The allowance rate is calculated from decided cases only and does not include applications awaiting examination.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all decisions by the examiner across their assigned art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 36% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record on decided applications only. Such figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions about any particular case. Aggregate statistics mask variation across individual art units and application-specific facts; they serve as one reference point for understanding historical context only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Questions about Examiner Asghar H Bilgrami

• 01What is Examiner Bilgrami's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 36%, based on 26 allowed applications out of 73 total disposed applications in TC 2100.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  This examiner works in one art unit (Art Unit 2143), all within TC 2100.
• 03Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?

  No. Historical allowance rates describe past decisions and are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. Each application depends on its own facts, claims, prior art, and arguments.
• 04What does 'disposed applications' mean?

  Disposed applications are those that have received a final decision—either allowed or abandoned. This count excludes applications still pending examination.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.