Examiner Ashish Thomas has allowed 20 of 22 decided applications (91%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ashish Thomas maintains a pooled record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 22 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 20, yielding a 91% allowance rate. Two applications were abandoned. This aggregate record spans multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions only, not predictions about pending or future applications.
This pooled record aggregates data across 2 art units in TC 2100. Allowance rates calculated from disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned) describe past outcomes across combined subject matter and do not forecast results on any particular application. Aggregate figures mask variation between individual art units; per-art-unit records appear in a separate section.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Based on 8 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ashish Thomas has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 25 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP