LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AUBREY H WYSZYNSKI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Aubrey H Wyszynski

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 52 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Aubrey H Wyszynski has allowed 37 of 52 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

71% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Aubrey H Wyszynski maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 52 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 37 and abandoned 15. The allowance rate stands at 71% of decided applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure represents outcomes across all applications in that art unit over the period covered by the public record. The allowance rate is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates applications across all art units assigned to the examiner. The 71% allowance rate describes the examiner's past disposed applications and does not predict the outcome of any particular case. Pooled figures mask variations within individual art units; applicants examining prosecution strategy may review per-art-unit details separately. Aggregate statistics are correlational data and do not establish causal relationships with any prosecution tactic.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2134
52 APPS · 71% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.

71% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION37 / 15 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39.1 moart unit avg 35.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.1 moart unit avg 50.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Aubrey H Wyszynski

  • What is the overall allowance rate for Examiner Wyszynski?
    The overall allowance rate is 71%, calculated from 37 allowed applications among 52 disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2134) in TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The 71% rate describes past disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application. It is a historical aggregate and does not establish outcomes for pending or future filings.
  • What is the difference between total and disposed applications?
    Disposed applications (52) are those decided by allowance or abandonment. Total applications include pending cases not yet decided. Allowance rate is calculated only from disposed applications.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aubrey H Wyszynski has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 52 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP