Examiner Augustine Kunle Obisesan has allowed 521 of 804 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Augustine Kunle Obisesan's public record spans 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 804 disposed applications, he allowed 521, for an allowance rate of 65%. The record reflects decisions made across multiple art units in this technology center. Of the 850 total applications in his file, 283 were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates his examination activity across the relevant art units and represents historical disposition data only.
A pooled record combines examination data across multiple art units, yielding an aggregate allowance rate that describes past outcomes rather than predictions about any individual application. The 65% figure reflects all decided cases across the examiner's assigned art units in TC 2100. Aggregate statistics do not predict the outcome of any specific application and do not account for variations in art unit, applicant strategy, or claim scope.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 404 decided applications with an interview and 386 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Augustine Kunle Obisesan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 850 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP