Examiner Aurangzeb Hassan has allowed 660 of 843 decided applications (78%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Aurangzeb Hassan maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 843 decided applications, the examiner has allowed 660 and abandoned 183, yielding an allowance rate of 78%. Across the examiner's art units, allowance rates range from 32% to 87%. This pooled figure aggregates results from multiple art units and reflects the examiner's historical record; it does not predict the outcome of any particular application.
This profile pools the examiner's record across multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 78% is a historical aggregate across all decided applications and does not forecast any single case. The range of 32% to 87% shows variation between individual art units; the pooled rate reflects the combined result. Historical figures describe past disposition patterns and are not predictions.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 191 decided applications with an interview and 524 without.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aurangzeb Hassan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 881 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP