Examiner Aurel Prifti has allowed 566 of 676 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Aurel Prifti maintains a public record across four art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 708 total applications, 566 were allowed and 110 abandoned, yielding 676 decided applications. The pooled allowance rate stands at 84% of those decided applications. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 75% to 90%, reflecting variation in the record across different art-unit assignments.
This pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units, presenting an overall historical picture rather than a prediction for any single application. The allowance rate describes past dispositions—allowed versus abandoned applications—across all assignments combined. Individual art units may show different rates; the aggregate figure represents the examiner's cross-unit profile and does not forecast outcomes on any specific filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 127 decided applications with an interview and 164 without.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems, and electric power networks.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 86 decided applications with an interview and 114 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 43 decided applications with an interview and 45 without.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 44 decided applications with an interview and 53 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Aurel Prifti has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 708 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP