Examiner Avi M Gold

What the data says.

Avi M Gold maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 50 applications, of which 16 were allowed and 34 were abandoned. This yields an overall allowance rate of 32% across the 50 decided applications. The pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record in this technology center and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates the examiner's work across all their assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate and disposition counts reflect past decisions and describe the examiner's historical profile. Aggregate statistics do not forecast outcomes in specific cases, nor do they account for differences in application quality, claim scope, prior art, or prosecution strategy. Each application is examined on its own merits.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Avi M Gold

• 01What is Avi M Gold's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 32%, calculated from 16 allowed applications among 50 disposed (decided) applications. This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Avi M Gold's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100. This pooled profile aggregates all work within that art unit.
• 03What does the 32% allowance rate mean?

  Of the 50 applications the examiner decided (allowed or abandoned), 32% resulted in allowance. The rate is based on completed decisions and excludes pending applications. It describes the examiner's past record, not a prediction for any future case.
• 04What subject matter does this examiner handle?

  Avi M Gold works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.