Examiner Ayal I Sharon

What the data says.

Examiner Ayal I Sharon maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 90 applications. Of those 90 decided applications, 61 were allowed and 29 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 68%. This figure represents the share of allowed applications among all applications that received a final disposition—either allowance or abandonment—during the period covered by this record.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate and application counts describe the examiner's historical record and reflect past dispositions. These aggregate figures are correlational data and are not predictions about the outcome of any particular application. An applicant's individual case depends on the specific claims, prior art, and arguments presented.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Ayal I Sharon

• 01What is Examiner Sharon's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 68%, based on 61 allowed applications and 29 abandoned applications out of 90 total disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does Examiner Sharon cover?

  The examiner's record spans one art unit (2123) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate include?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications—those that received either an allowance or abandonment—and excludes pending applications. It is a historical summary, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 04What is the subject matter of this examiner's work?

  Examiner Sharon works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.