LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AYMAN FATIMA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Ayman Fatima

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 20 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Ayman Fatima has allowed 15 of 20 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

75% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Ayman Fatima maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 50 total applications, 20 applications have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Of those 20 decided applications, 15 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 75%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure describes the historical record only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units in TC 2100 into a single pooled rate. The 75% allowance rate reflects past decisions on 20 applications and does not predict how any individual application will be examined or decided. Pooled rates describe historical performance across different subject-matter areas and are correlational, not causal. They provide context for an examiner's overall record but do not forecast outcomes on specific claims.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2176
50 APPS · 75% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

75% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 59%
DISPOSITION15 / 5 / 30allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.9 moart unit avg 23.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY28.1 moart unit avg 40.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility27% · art unit 41%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%
§103 — Obviousness96% · art unit 87%
§112 — Written description & definiteness53%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Ayman Fatima

  • What is Ayman Fatima's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 75%, calculated from 15 allowed applications out of 20 decided applications in the public record.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The record spans one art unit in TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate apply to my application?
    The 75% figure describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined on its individual merits.
  • How many applications are included in this record?
    The examiner's public record includes 50 total applications, of which 20 have been decided (allowed or abandoned).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ayman Fatima has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 50 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP