LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AYMAN FATIMA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER, ART UNIT, OR APPLICATION #
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Ayman Fatima

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 20 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT
75%vs 59% art-unit average+16 pts

Examiner Ayman Fatima has allowed 15 of 20 decided applications in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

allowed15abandoned5pending30· pending excluded from the rate
DATA UPDATED JULY 14, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Ayman Fatima maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning 1 art unit. Across dozens of decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 75%. This figure represents the share of applications that issued or were abandoned among all decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The allowance rate is calculated from decided cases only and excludes pending applications. This record reflects dispositions on applications examined within TC 2100.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art units. The allowance rate of 75% describes the historical proportion of allowed and abandoned applications relative to all decisions made. Aggregate figures characterize past outcomes and do not constitute predictions about any specific application. Individual art units may show different patterns; a separate section provides per-art-unit detail. Pooled statistics serve as context for understanding the examiner's overall record.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2176
50 APPS · 75% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.

75% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 59%
DISPOSITION15 / 5 / 30allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.9 moart unit avg 23.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY28.1 moart unit avg 40.5 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
REJECTION RATE = SHARE OF THIS EXAMINER'S APPLICATIONS THAT DREW ≥1 OFFICE-ACTION REJECTION IN WHICH THE GROUND APPEARS

Grounds can co-occur, so the four don't sum to 100%. The art-unit figure is the unweighted mean across examiners in the art unit; §102 and §112 carry no art-unit benchmark.

§101 — Subject-matter eligibility25%art unit 40%15 pts
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)100%no art-unit benchmark
§103 — Obviousness96%art unit 87%+9 pts
§112 — Written description & definiteness56%no art-unit benchmark
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Ayman Fatima

  • What is Ayman Fatima's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 75%, representing the share of allowed and abandoned applications among all decided applications in the examiner's pooled record across Technology Center 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of applications that issued or were abandoned, divided by all decided applications. It does not include pending applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How large is the sample of decided applications?
    The pooled record covers dozens of decided applications across all art units.
◈ HOW LYNCH LLP CAN HELP

Where to go next.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. These are general resources about the firm's services — not advice about this examiner or any specific application.

Patent prosecution at Lynch LLPApplication drafting, office-action responses, and prosecution strategy before the USPTO.PTAB trials and patent appealsAppeals, inter partes review, and patent-owner defense before the PTAB.Building a patent portfolioHow a patent portfolio is sequenced and built over a multi-year horizon.Booking a consultationFree and paid consultation options across the firm's attorneys.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ayman Fatima has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated July 14, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 50 applications.

Rejection rates. Each §-rate is the share of this examiner's applications that drew at least one office-action rejection in which that statutory ground appears; applications with no rejection on record are excluded, and because grounds can co-occur the four do not sum to 100%. The art-unit figure beside each is the unweighted mean of the per-examiner rates across the art unit, published for §101 and §103 only. Beside the overall allowance rate we show a benchmark: for a single-art-unit examiner it is exactly that art unit's average, labeled “art-unit average”; for an examiner spanning several art units it is the “weighted peer average” — the per-art-unit averages, weighted by this examiner's application count in each — labeled distinctly because it is a blended figure, not any single art unit's average. Both are built from the same per-art-unit averages the panels show.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP