LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/AZIZUL Q CHOUDHURY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Azizul Q Choudhury

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 71 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Azizul Q Choudhury has allowed 27 of 71 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

38% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Azizul Q Choudhury maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 71 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 27 and abandoned 44. The allowance rate is 38%, measured as a percentage of decided applications. The examiner's practice spans 1 art unit. This pooled record reflects decisions made across all assigned art units and does not predict outcomes in any specific pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 38% describes past dispositions and is correlational, not a prediction of future outcomes on any individual case. Pooled figures mask variation across different art units; detailed per-art-unit data, where available, may provide additional context. These statistics describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any pending matter.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2145
71 APPS · 38% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

38% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 53%
DISPOSITION27 / 44 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION38.5 moart unit avg 26.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.2 moart unit avg 45.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Azizul Q Choudhury

  • What is Azizul Q Choudhury's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 38%, based on 27 allowed applications out of 71 total disposed applications in TC 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2145) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What do these statistics mean for my application?
    The pooled figures describe the examiner's past record only and are not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Actual results depend on the merits, prior art, and arguments in each case.
  • Why is the allowance rate measured against disposed applications?
    Allowance rate is the percentage of decided (allowed or abandoned) applications. Pending applications are excluded because their outcome is not yet determined.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Azizul Q Choudhury has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 71 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP