Examiner Azizul Q Choudhury has allowed 27 of 71 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Azizul Q Choudhury maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 71 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 27 and abandoned 44. The allowance rate is 38%, measured as a percentage of decided applications. The examiner's practice spans 1 art unit. This pooled record reflects decisions made across all assigned art units and does not predict outcomes in any specific pending application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 38% describes past dispositions and is correlational, not a prediction of future outcomes on any individual case. Pooled figures mask variation across different art units; detailed per-art-unit data, where available, may provide additional context. These statistics describe what has occurred, not what will occur in any pending matter.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Azizul Q Choudhury has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 71 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP