Examiner Bao Q Truong

What the data says.

Examiner Bao Q Truong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 70 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 65 and abandoned 5, yielding an allowance rate of 93%. This record spans one art unit. The allowance rate reflects the percentage of applications decided (allowed or abandoned), excluding pending matters. The figure is based on the examiner's complete pooled history across all assigned art units.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's purview. The 93% allowance rate describes the historical share of decided applications that were allowed. Pooled figures represent past disposition patterns and are correlational, not predictive. They do not indicate the outcome of any individual application, nor do they account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prior-art posture across art units or over time.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).

Questions about Examiner Bao Q Truong

• 01What is Examiner Bao Q Truong's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 93% across 70 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2187).
• 03Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The pooled allowance rate describes the examiner's historical disposition and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
• 04What is the difference between allowed, abandoned, and disposed applications?

  Allowed applications were approved. Abandoned applications were not pursued to allowance. Disposed applications are the sum of allowed and abandoned (all decided matters, excluding pending).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.