Examiner Baoquoc N To has allowed 1,050 of 1,188 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Baoquoc N To maintains a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 1,188 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 88%, derived from 1,050 allowed applications and 138 abandoned applications. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 85% to 91%, reflecting variation in outcomes among the individual art units in which the examiner works.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units in TC 2100. The figures presented describe the examiner's historical record and do not constitute a prediction of any specific application's outcome. An aggregate allowance rate reflects past decisions across diverse application types and does not determine the fate of any individual filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 284 decided applications with an interview and 412 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 150 decided applications with an interview and 330 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Baoquoc N To has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,240 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP