Examiner Baotran N To has allowed 36 of 63 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Baotran N To maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a pooled record of 63 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 36 and abandoned 27, corresponding to an allowance rate of 57%. This record spans a single art unit, aggregating outcomes across all applications in that unit's jurisdiction. The allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided cases—both allowed and abandoned applications—and does not include pending matters. This pooled figure represents the examiner's historical record and is factual in nature only.
This profile presents a pooled record aggregating all applications across the examiner's art unit(s). The allowance rate of 57% is a historical summary and not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled records combine different patent applications and technologies within the art unit's scope. Aggregate statistics describe past disposal patterns and do not forecast results in individual cases. Individual application circumstances, claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history remain distinct factors in each case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 20 decided applications with an interview and 43 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Baotran N To has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 63 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP