Examiner Beatriz A Ramirez Bravo has allowed 68 of 103 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Beatriz A Ramirez Bravo maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 103 disposed applications, her allowance rate is 66%, with a range of 65% to 67% across her art units. Of her 131 total applications on file, 68 have been allowed and 35 abandoned. The allowance rate reflects only decided cases and excludes pending applications from the calculation.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units within TC 2100, combining different application cohorts into a single historical snapshot. The allowance rate and range are descriptive of past dispositions and do not constitute a prediction about any specific application. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units; detailed per-unit records are available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 30 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 19 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Beatriz A Ramirez Bravo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 131 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP