Examiner Beatriz Prieto has allowed 35 of 57 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Beatriz Prieto's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 57 disposed applications, 35 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 61%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record aggregates all decisions within the single art unit served by this examiner.
A pooled record combines data across all art units an examiner works in. The allowance rate and application counts shown here are historical aggregates—they describe what occurred in the past, not what will occur in any specific future application. Individual art-unit records may show variation. These figures are correlational summaries, not predictive tools for any particular case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Beatriz Prieto has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 57 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP