LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BEATRIZ PRIETO
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Beatriz Prieto

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 57 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2007
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Beatriz Prieto has allowed 35 of 57 decided applications (61%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

61% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Beatriz Prieto's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 57 disposed applications, 35 were allowed and 22 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 61%. This rate reflects decided cases only and does not include pending applications. The record aggregates all decisions within the single art unit served by this examiner.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record combines data across all art units an examiner works in. The allowance rate and application counts shown here are historical aggregates—they describe what occurred in the past, not what will occur in any specific future application. Individual art-unit records may show variation. These figures are correlational summaries, not predictive tools for any particular case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2142
57 APPS · 61% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

61% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 45%
DISPOSITION35 / 22 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION28.9 moart unit avg 30.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY47.3 moart unit avg 48.3 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Beatriz Prieto

  • What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?
    61%, calculated across 57 decided (allowed and abandoned) applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    One art unit (2142) in TC 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate include pending applications?
    No. The 61% rate covers only decided applications (35 allowed, 22 abandoned). Pending cases are excluded.
  • What does this record predict about my application?
    This is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Beatriz Prieto has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 57 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP