LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BEEMNET W DADA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Beemnet W Dada

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 138 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Beemnet W Dada has allowed 85 of 138 decided applications (62%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

62% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Beemnet W Dada maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 138 disposed applications, 85 were allowed and 53 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 62%. The examiner's work spans a single art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes on decided applications and does not predict results on any individual pending case.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all decided applications across the examiner's art units. The 62% allowance rate describes the historical share of allowed applications among all disposed cases and is calculated from a complete set of decided matters. Pooled figures reflect past outcomes and are not predictions for any specific application. Individual art units may show different patterns; refer to art-unit-specific data for those details.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2135
138 APPS · 62% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

62% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 66%
DISPOSITION85 / 53 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION39 moart unit avg 26.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY58.2 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Beemnet W Dada

  • What is Examiner Dada's overall allowance rate?
    62%. This is the percentage of allowed applications among 138 disposed (decided) applications in the examiner's pooled record across all art units.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    One art unit (2135) within TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled record include?
    The pooled record combines all disposed applications across all art units where the examiner has worked. It describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Beemnet W Dada has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 138 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP