Examiner Behzad Peikari has allowed 378 of 416 decided applications (91%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Behzad Peikari has a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 416 disposed applications, 378 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 91%. The allowance rate ranges from 89% to 95% across his art units. This pooled figure represents the examiner's aggregate record in TC 2100 and reflects the outcome distribution of decided cases—both allowances and abandonments—excluding any pending applications.
A pooled record aggregates statistics across multiple art units, presenting an overall picture of the examiner's past dispositions. The allowance rate and range reflect historical outcomes in decided applications and are not a prediction of how any specific application will be handled. Individual art units may show variation; the range provided captures the breadth of that variation across the examiner's portfolio in the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 268 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Behzad Peikari has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 416 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP