Examiner Belix M Ortiz Ditren has allowed 771 of 897 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Belix M Ortiz Ditren maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 924 total applications, 897 have been disposed (decided). Of those decided applications, 771 were allowed and 126 abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled allowance rate is a historical aggregate and does not predict the outcome of any specific application.
This record is pooled across all art units in which the examiner works. When an examiner works in multiple art units, the aggregate figures—allowance rate, application counts—combine different subject areas and examination patterns. The 86% allowance rate reflects the examiner's past disposed applications across all assigned art units and is a description of historical record only, not a forecast for any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 294 decided applications with an interview and 603 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Belix M Ortiz Ditren has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 924 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP