Examiner Ben C Wang

What the data says.

Ben C Wang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a pooled record of 486 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 404 and abandoned 82. The allowance rate is 83% of decided applications. This record spans one art unit. The figures reflect historical dispositions and do not constitute predictions for any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates dispositions across all art units assigned to the examiner. The pooled allowance rate represents the share of decided applications that resulted in allowance, calculated from allowed plus abandoned applications only—pending applications are excluded. Aggregate historical statistics describe past record and are not predictions of outcomes in any specific case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines software engineering.

Questions about Examiner Ben C Wang

• 01What is Ben C Wang's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 83%, calculated from 404 allowed applications and 82 abandoned applications out of 486 total disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  This record spans one art unit (2192), and the figures represent the pooled record across all assigned art units.
• 03What does the allowance rate mean?

  The allowance rate is the percentage of decided (disposed) applications that were allowed. It excludes pending applications and is calculated from allowed and abandoned dispositions only.
• 04Does this record predict my application's outcome?

  No. Historical aggregate statistics do not constitute a prediction for any specific application. Individual outcomes depend on the merits, claims, and prosecution history of each case.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.