LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BENJAMIN E LANIER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Benjamin E Lanier

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 112 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION DEC 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Benjamin E Lanier has allowed 59 of 112 decided applications (53%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

53% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Benjamin E Lanier maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record spans one art unit and covers 112 disposed applications. Of those 112 decided applications, 59 were allowed and 53 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 53%. This figure represents the proportion of applications that received allowances among all applications with final dispositions in his record.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units where the examiner works. The allowance rate and application counts describe historical outcomes and do not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application. Aggregate figures reflect past decisions across potentially varied subject matter and prosecution histories. Individual application outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and arguments specific to each case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
112 APPS · 53% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

53% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION59 / 53 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY55.7 moart unit avg 41 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW77%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW47%+30 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 90 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Benjamin E Lanier

  • What is Benjamin E Lanier's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 53%, calculated from 59 allowed applications among 112 total disposed applications. This is a historical figure and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The public record spans one art unit (2132). The pooled figures aggregate all work within that unit.
  • What is the total number of applications in this examiner's record?
    The record covers 112 disposed applications—those with final decisions. This count excludes any pending applications.
  • What subject matter does this examiner work in?
    The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Benjamin E Lanier has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 112 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP