LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BENJAMIN MATTHEW ROHD
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Benjamin Matthew Rohd

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 3 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Benjamin Matthew Rohd has allowed 0 of 3 decided applications (0%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

0% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Benjamin Matthew Rohd maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 44 total applications, 3 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 3 decided applications, 0 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 0%. The record is limited in size; the disposed count reflects only finalized cases and excludes pending applications. This pooled figure represents outcomes across the examiner's assigned art units to date.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates outcomes across all art units assigned to the examiner. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only—those allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending filings. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past record and are correlational in nature. They are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application and do not account for individual case facts, claim scope, or prosecution history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2147
44 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 44%
DISPOSITION0 / 3 / 41allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION36.5 moart unit avg 29.3 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY50 moart unit avg 46.8 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility74% · art unit 74%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)45%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 86%
§112 — Written description & definiteness55%

Based on 44 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Benjamin Matthew Rohd

  • What is this examiner's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 0%, based on 3 decided applications (allowed plus abandoned). This figure does not include pending applications and is not a prediction for any specific case.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This examiner is assigned to 1 art unit within TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled record include?
    The pooled record aggregates all outcomes across the examiner's assigned art units. It includes 44 total applications, of which 3 have been decided. The remaining applications are pending and are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
  • Does this record predict outcomes for my application?
    No. Historical allowance rates are correlational summaries of past decisions and are not predictions of future outcomes. Each application is evaluated on its own merits, facts, and claim scope.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Benjamin Matthew Rohd has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 44 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP