Examiner Berhanu Mitiku has allowed 232 of 414 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Berhanu Mitiku's public record spans 445 total applications across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 414 disposed applications, 232 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. The record reflects decisions made across multiple art units within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work in those units and does not indicate the rate for any specific application or art unit.
This pooled record aggregates Berhanu Mitiku's decisions across 2 art units in TC 2100. The 56% allowance rate describes past dispositions over 414 decided applications and is a historical summary, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures smooth variation across individual art units and reflect the examiner's overall record in the technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 189 decided applications with an interview and 215 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Berhanu Mitiku has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 445 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP