LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BERHANU MITIKU
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Berhanu Mitiku

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 414 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Berhanu Mitiku has allowed 232 of 414 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

56% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2156 · 57%AU 2169 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Berhanu Mitiku's public record spans 445 total applications across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 414 disposed applications, 232 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. The record reflects decisions made across multiple art units within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work in those units and does not indicate the rate for any specific application or art unit.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates Berhanu Mitiku's decisions across 2 art units in TC 2100. The 56% allowance rate describes past dispositions over 414 decided applications and is a historical summary, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures smooth variation across individual art units and reflect the examiner's overall record in the technology center.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2156
435 APPS · 57% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

57% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 69%
DISPOSITION232 / 172 / 31allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22 moart unit avg 20.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY56.7 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility72% · art unit 56%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)64%
§103 — Obviousness97% · art unit 84%
§112 — Written description & definiteness50%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW71%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW46%+25 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 189 decided applications with an interview and 215 without.

ART UNIT 2169
10 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION0 / 10 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION25.8 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37 moart unit avg 40 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Berhanu Mitiku

  • What is Berhanu Mitiku's allowance rate?
    56% across 414 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    2 art units: 2156 and 2169, both in TC 2100.
  • Does this allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. This is a pooled historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. The rate reflects past decisions and does not indicate what will happen in any individual case.
  • What do the abandoned applications represent?
    182 applications were abandoned; these count as disposed (decided) and factor into the 56% allowance rate calculation alongside the 232 allowed applications.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Berhanu Mitiku has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 445 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP