Examiner Bin Xue has allowed 100 of 151 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Bin Xue maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 151 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 100 and abandoned 51, for an overall allowance rate of 66%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across one art unit. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record—the percentage of decided applications that were allowed—and does not itself convey information about prosecution speed, claim complexity, or the content of rejections and responses.
This profile pools the examiner's record across all art units under their jurisdiction. The allowance rate is a summary statistic: the percentage of applications that reached a final allowed disposition among all applications that were decided (allowed or abandoned). Pooled figures describe the past record and are not predictions about any individual application. Art-unit-level detail may be available separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 60 decided applications with an interview and 91 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Bin Xue has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 151 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP