Examiner Binh K Luu has allowed 98 of 132 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Binh K Luu maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 132 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 98 and abandoned 34, yielding a 74% allowance rate. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects the proportion of decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The 74% allowance rate describes historical dispositions—allowed and abandoned applications combined—among all decided cases. Pooled figures reflect past activity and are descriptive only; they are not predictions of outcomes in individual applications, nor do they account for variation across different art units or application characteristics.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 84 decided applications with an interview and 48 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Binh K Luu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 132 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP