Examiner Binh Van Ho has allowed 554 of 659 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Binh Van Ho maintains a pooled allowance rate of 84% across 659 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's record spans two art units. Among these art units, allowance rates range from 82% to 87%. Of the 659 decided applications, 554 were allowed and 105 were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across different subject areas within TC 2100 and reflects historical outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition.
A pooled record combines data from multiple art units into a single aggregate figure. The 84% allowance rate reflects past decisions across all of the examiner's assigned art units and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates vary among art units; the range shown (82% to 87%) indicates this variation. Aggregate statistics describe historical performance and do not forecast results in any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 65 decided applications with an interview and 350 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 84 decided applications with an interview and 160 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Binh Van Ho has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 659 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP