Examiner Blake K Kumabe

What the data says.

Blake K Kumabe maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 135 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 107 and abandoned 28, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. This rate reflects decided cases and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, meaning all figures derive from a pooled record within one classification area. The 79% allowance rate describes the historical outcome of applications examined and decided; it is not a prediction of any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates dispositions across one art unit within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate of 79% describes past outcomes on 135 decided applications and does not forecast the result of any individual case. Aggregate figures mask variation within the art unit and do not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prior art. Interpreting a pooled record requires recognizing that it is correlational data, not predictive of future prosecution.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines program control and execution.

Questions about Examiner Blake K Kumabe

• 01What is Blake K Kumabe's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 79%, calculated from 107 allowed applications and 28 abandoned applications across 135 total disposed applications. This rate applies to decided cases and does not include pending applications.
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (2195) within Technology Center 2100. All figures are aggregated across that single classification.
• 03Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The allowance rate describes historical outcomes on 135 decided applications. It is not a prediction of any specific application and does not account for individual claim language, prior art, or prosecution history.
• 04What subject matter does this examiner handle?

  Blake K Kumabe examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.