Examiner Bradley A Teets has allowed 297 of 364 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Bradley A Teets maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 364 disposed applications, 297 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 82%. The allowance rate ranges from 78% to 95% across these art units. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across multiple distinct art units and reflects historical dispositions only, not any prediction about individual pending or future applications.
This record represents a pooled aggregate across 2 art units in TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe the examiner's past record and are correlational, not predictive. Different art units may carry different rates and procedural patterns. The figures shown are historical—they describe what has been decided, not what will occur on any specific application. Review of per-art-unit detail, where available, may provide additional context.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 194 decided applications with an interview and 97 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution, and software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 21 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Bradley A Teets has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 364 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP