Examiner Bradley E Edelman

What the data says.

Bradley E Edelman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 27 decided applications, the examiner allowed 18 and abandoned 9, yielding a 67% allowance rate. This rate reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided; it does not characterize pending filings. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, pooling all activity in that unit into one aggregate profile. The figures presented here describe the historical record and are not predictions of outcomes on any individual application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all applications and outcomes within the examiner's assigned art units in TC 2100. The 67% allowance rate is computed from all decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and describes what has occurred in the past. Pooled figures do not isolate differences among art units or time periods, and do not forecast the result on any specific filing. The aggregate serves as a factual summary of the examiner's overall record in this technology center.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Bradley E Edelman

• 01What is the overall allowance rate for this examiner?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 67%, based on 18 allowed applications and 9 abandoned applications among 27 total decided applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit in TC 2100.
• 03Does this record predict outcomes on my application?

  No. The pooled record describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application's result. Allowance rates reflect historical decisions and vary by application, amendment strategy, and claim scope.
• 04What technology center does this examiner work in?

  Bradley E Edelman examines applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.