Examiner Brandon Parker has allowed 13 of 69 decided applications (19%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Brandon Parker maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled allowance rate is 19% over 69 disposed applications (13 allowed, 56 abandoned). The allowance rate ranges from 14% to 30% across these art units. This aggregate figure represents his historical record across the technology center and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This record aggregates Parker's work across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate reflects past decisions on closed applications and describes the distribution of allowed versus abandoned cases overall. The range (14% to 30%) shows variation among individual art units but does not predict outcomes in any particular application. Aggregate statistics are historical summaries, not forward-looking indicators.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 20 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brandon Parker has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 69 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP