Examiner Brandon S Bludau has allowed 10 of 22 decided applications (45%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Brandon S Bludau has a public record of 22 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those 22 decided applications, 10 were allowed and 12 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 45%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2132), pooled into this overall profile. These figures represent the examiner's historical record across all disposed cases and do not indicate the outcome of any pending or future application.
This record aggregates all applications decided by the examiner across their assigned art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate and disposition counts reflect past outcomes pooled together and describe the examiner's historical record only. Aggregate figures are not predictions about any specific application or art unit. Individual art-unit breakdowns, if available, may show variation within the examiner's portfolio.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brandon S Bludau has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 22 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP