LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BRANDON S HOFFMAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Brandon S Hoffman

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 128 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Brandon S Hoffman has allowed 70 of 128 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

55% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Brandon S Hoffman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 128 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 55%, meaning 70 applications were allowed and 58 were abandoned. This record spans one art unit. The allowance rate describes the examiner's historical ratio of allowances to total decided applications and does not predict the outcome of any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across the examiner's art units and reflects the examiner's overall decision history. Aggregate allowance rates describe past outcomes and are historical facts, not predictors of individual application results. Each application is examined on its own merits according to statute. The figures here represent correlation in the record, not causation in any particular case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2136
128 APPS · 55% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

55% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 60%
DISPOSITION70 / 58 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION38.4 moart unit avg 27.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.4 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Brandon S Hoffman

  • What is Brandon S Hoffman's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 55% across 128 disposed applications—70 allowed and 58 abandoned. This is a statement of the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (2136) within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) that were allowed. It reflects the examiner's historical ratio and does not indicate the likelihood or outcome of any particular application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brandon S Hoffman has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 128 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP