Examiner Brian E Weinrich has allowed 193 of 264 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Brian E Weinrich maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across all art units, his pooled record spans 264 disposed applications, with 193 allowed and 71 abandoned. This yields an overall allowance rate of 73% over the decided count. The examiner's record covers one art unit. This statistic reflects historical dispositions and does not predict outcomes for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units where the examiner has issued decisions. The overall allowance rate of 73% describes past dispositions across 264 decided applications and is not a prediction for any individual case. Aggregate figures in cross-art-unit records reflect the examiner's historical record and do not forecast the outcome of any particular application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 167 decided applications with an interview and 97 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brian E Weinrich has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 264 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP