LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/BRIAN P JOHNSON
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Brian P Johnson

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 77 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAY 2009
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Brian P Johnson has allowed 44 of 77 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

57% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Brian P Johnson maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 77 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 57%, with 44 allowed and 33 abandoned. This figure represents decisions only and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit, pooling his activity within TC 2100. These statistics reflect historical dispositions and do not indicate the outcome of any particular application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner, presenting a single overall allowance rate and application count. This aggregate describes the examiner's past decisions and is not a prediction about any specific application. The allowance rate is computed only from decided cases (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending filings. Pooled figures are useful for understanding broad patterns but do not account for variations across individual art units.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2183
77 APPS · 57% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines program control and execution.

57% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION44 / 33 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION29.9 moart unit avg 25 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY51.6 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Brian P Johnson

  • What is Examiner Brian P Johnson's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 57%, computed from 44 allowed applications and 33 abandoned applications out of 77 disposed cases. This figure is a summary of past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    The pooled record covers one art unit (2183) within Technology Center 2100. Statistics presented here aggregate the examiner's activity across that unit.
  • What does 'disposed applications' mean?
    Disposed applications are those decided—either allowed or abandoned. The count of 77 disposed applications excludes any pending cases and serves as the denominator for computing the allowance rate.
  • Can this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any individual application's outcome. It reflects past decisions and does not indicate the result of any pending or future case.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brian P Johnson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 77 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP