Examiner Brian P Johnson has allowed 44 of 77 decided applications (57%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Brian P Johnson maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 77 disposed applications, his allowance rate is 57%, with 44 allowed and 33 abandoned. This figure represents decisions only and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's record spans one art unit, pooling his activity within TC 2100. These statistics reflect historical dispositions and do not indicate the outcome of any particular application.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units assigned to the examiner, presenting a single overall allowance rate and application count. This aggregate describes the examiner's past decisions and is not a prediction about any specific application. The allowance rate is computed only from decided cases (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending filings. Pooled figures are useful for understanding broad patterns but do not account for variations across individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brian P Johnson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 77 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP