Examiner Brian P Whipple

What the data says.

Brian P Whipple maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 25 disposed applications, he allowed 9 and abandoned 16, for an allowance rate of 36%. His record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects decisions made across his caseload to date and describes the historical record only. The allowance rate is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all decisions across the examiner's art units into a single allowance rate. The 36% figure reflects past dispositions on 25 decided applications and does not forecast the outcome of any individual case. Pooled rates describe historical performance; they are correlational summaries, not predictive models or causal indicators of how any future application will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Brian P Whipple

• 01What is Brian P Whipple's overall allowance rate?

  36%, based on 25 disposed applications (9 allowed, 16 abandoned).
• 02How many art units does his record cover?

  One art unit. This pooled page presents his aggregate record across all assignments.
• 03Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition.
• 04What technology areas does he handle?

  Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.