Examiner Brittany N Allen has allowed 173 of 406 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Brittany N Allen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 447 total applications, 173 were allowed and 233 abandoned, for a disposed count of 406 applications. The examiner's allowance rate is 43% of decided applications. This record spans a single art unit, pooled to reflect the examiner's overall activity in the technology center.
This record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 43% describes the examiner's past record over 406 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; applicants may review per-art-unit records separately to understand examiner activity in their specific classification.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 260 decided applications with an interview and 146 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brittany N Allen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 447 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP