Examiner Broderick C Anderson has allowed 205 of 272 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Broderick C Anderson maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 301 total applications, 205 have been allowed and 67 abandoned, for a pooled allowance rate of 75% over 272 disposed applications. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across both art units and reflects the examiner's historical record to date. The allowance rate is calculated only from decided applications; pending applications are excluded from this percentage.
This record represents a pooled, cross-art-unit aggregate. It combines outcomes from multiple art units within TC 2100 into a single historical snapshot. The 75% allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction about any specific application. Pooled data masks variation between individual art units; applicants reviewing this examiner may wish to consult per-art-unit records separately to understand subject-matter-specific patterns.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 147 decided applications with an interview and 115 without.
Based on 10 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Broderick C Anderson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 301 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP