Examiner Brooke Jazmond Taylor has allowed 205 of 312 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Brooke Jazmond Taylor's public record spans 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 312 disposed applications, 205 were allowed and 107 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 66%. The allowance rate ranges from 66% to 67% across the examiner's art units. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome of decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 66% describes past dispositions across all applications in the examiner's portfolio and reflects a historical aggregate. Pooled figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application, nor do they account for variation in claim complexity, prosecution history, or art-unit-specific examination patterns. Applicants may review art-unit-level detail separately for more granular information.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 102 decided applications with an interview and 189 without.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Brooke Jazmond Taylor has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 312 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP