Examiner Brooks T Hale

What the data says.

Brooks T Hale maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 128 total applications, 82 applications have been decided (allowed or abandoned). Of those 82 decided applications, 43 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 52%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall historical rate across all art units in this technology center and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate reflects past decisions on applications that have been fully decided (allowed or abandoned); pending applications are excluded from the calculation. Aggregate historical rates describe the examiner's record and are not predictions about the outcome of any individual application or prosecution path.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Brooks T Hale

• 01What is Brooks T Hale's overall allowance rate?

  The examiner's allowance rate is 52%, based on 43 allowed applications among 82 decided applications (allowed plus abandoned).
• 02How many art units does this record cover?

  This pooled record covers one art unit (Art Unit 2166) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate include and exclude?

  The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only—those allowed or abandoned. Pending applications are excluded. The rate does not apply to or predict outcomes for any specific application.
• 04What technology area does this examiner work in?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.