Examiner Bruce A Witzenburg has allowed 68 of 135 decided applications (50%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Bruce A Witzenburg maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 135 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 68 and abandoned 67, producing an overall allowance rate of 50%. This record is pooled across a single art unit (2166). The allowance rate reflects outcomes on decided applications and does not include pending filings. All disposed applications have reached a final decision.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across one art unit in TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 50% describes historical outcomes on 135 decided applications and is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific case. Pooled figures mask variation within individual art units, which may be explored separately. Past disposition rates are correlational, not predictive.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 50 decided applications with an interview and 85 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Bruce A Witzenburg has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 135 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP