Examiner Bryan Pai Song Huang has allowed 24 of 28 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Bryan Pai Song Huang's public record covers 54 total applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 28 disposed applications, 24 were allowed, yielding an 86% allowance rate. Four applications were abandoned. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2114). This pooled allowance rate reflects decisions across the art unit over the period covered by the public record and does not constitute a prediction of outcomes in any specific application.
This record aggregates all dispositions across the examiner's art units into a single pooled statistic. The 86% allowance rate is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and describes the historical record only. Aggregate figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application, which depends on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history. Pooled data masks variation within individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Bryan Pai Song Huang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP